• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

My TechDecisions

  • COVID-19 Update
  • Best of Tech Decisions
  • Topics
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Mobility
    • Unified Communications
    • IT Infrastructure
    • Network Security
    • Physical Security
    • Facility
    • Compliance
  • RFP Resources
  • Resources
  • Podcasts
  • Subscribe
  • Project of the Week
  • About Us
    SEARCH
Compliance, Facility

How Dealing with Faculty Input Complicates the Technology Decision Process at Universities

Faculty input – from teachers as well as registrars and budgeting committees – is a vital, but sometimes disruptive, part of the technology manager’s decision process at universities.

August 2, 2017 Jonathan Blackwood Leave a Comment

Making a technology decision at any institution isn’t easy. There are multiple parties involved, budgetary needs to consider, and processes already in place that could be changed. Nowhere is this difficulty more apparent than in universities, where faculty input is critical but not always easy to come by or implement.

I learned this directly from a group of technology manager’s from several universities around New England recently. TechDecisions has teamed up with AdTech Systems to hold a series of roundtable discussions with end users. We discuss everything that has to do with the technology decision process, from budget concerns to pain points to working with integrators to get systems up and running. The first of these discussions focused on technology managers at universities.

One of the running themes I recognized throughout our discussion was just how much faculty play a part in the technology decision process. A theme that ran alongside that was the difficulty that comes with gathering faculty input.

Setting the Standards

Let’s start with the pre-installation process – a staple for any institution, university or otherwise. At universities, budgets can be set by the registrar, a committee typically made up of faculty, or a designated individual. Similarly, standards can be set by any combination of the same groups or individuals, depending on the institution.

“We have a group on campus, the Educational Technology Assessment Group, that meets far too infrequently,” says Jesse Anderson, Audio Visual Services Manager at the College of the Holy Cross. “But, I work with the registrar, and I have people who work with the dean, and we determine what the current needs are. We also watch the faculty that are out on the edge to know what the approaching needs are.”

It works a bit differently at other institutions.

“We have a similar setup,” says Douglas Anderson, Classroom Technology Manager at Lesly College. “We have a committee called TLTech with the associate provost, faculty representatives, the library, IT, and they meet monthly to talk about a lot of things related to classroom technology design. That’s where our standards go. Any deviations from that standard, like if you want to remove DVD players from a building, it’s got to pass that committee.”

Related: 6 Things Every University Technology Manager Has To Deal With

So immediately, we learn that standards aren’t always standard, as Jesse continues to explain.

“One of the difficulties is that, for four people from four institutions that do essentially the same thing, I would wager that if you walk into our classrooms there would be similarities, but a whole lot of differences as well,” says Jesse Anderson. “So it’s hard to say this is a standard 2017 classroom install. Because what meets my needs won’t necessarily meet others’ needs. We set a standard every year, and we build every new room to that standard, but it doesn’t mean it’s going to work for another institution.”

Instead, every institution decides on its own needs. Which sounds like a good idea at first glance. Every institution of higher learning is going to operate differently. If I want my institution to run to the best of its ability, then I should customize everything to aide how my institution runs. Especially with technology that will help faculty teach and students learn.

Working with the Faculty

The problem for technology managers is that not all teachers teach the same. Not all students learn the same. And not all technology is installed for teachers and students, while there remains only a set amount of budget to go around.

“As far as the budget, I have a pretty good idea what I’m going to get every year. But there are other projects that aren’t my projects,” says Ken Stewart, Classroom Technology Manager at Curry College. “For example, new construction projects. They’re putting two new classes in and they want an AV quote. I’m not running that project so it’s hard for me to get it down. You’re dealing with all these other decision makers. It’s a lot more difficult. Classrooms that I can forecast every year are easy. It’s those other projects that other people own, with other people getting involved, that become difficult. Because they don’t understand the AV process.”

“Are you designing to meet the needs of the faculty or are you designing to meet the potential needs of the faculty?” asks Chris Imming, Director of Media Services at Gordon College. “I know I’m designing a room that meets the needs of the entire campus. But I know, at my institution, I don’t have a bunch of people that are pushing up on that limit. I might have a physics professor that says he wants surround sound. I can turn around and tell him that he has no pedagogical reason for surround sound.

“Honestly, I find over the last three years I met less one on one or in group sessions with faculty. Like many schools, we have a center for teaching excellence, and I meet biweekly with their director. They’re the ones working within the sphere of the provost’s office on pedagogical development, course curriculum redesign, and back end support for the faculty. So, in doing proof testing of classroom technology plans, layout, and future casting, we find that we can satisfy the needs of the faculty but also work towards an institutional directive.

The technology manager becomes just that – a manager. In charge of taking input from a number of sources, working within the frame that he is given, and delivering to the best of his ability. For someone that is hired to work with technology, there is a stunning amount of internal relations work that goes into designing and installing a system.

Getting Faculty Involved

How does the technology manager manage to meet the needs of a diverse staff that teaches in different ways? You involve the staff. This isn’t always easy.

Believe it or not, technology managers want faculty input. It’s a fun caricature, the technology savant with his myriad systems, insistent upon total control and unwilling to bend to the requests of the imbeciles that use the systems. That’s far from the case, however.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2
Jonathan Blackwood
Jonathan Blackwood

Jonathan Blackwood is the Editor-in-Chief of TechDecisions. Jonathan joined TechDecisions in 2014 and writes about technologies that help to innovate and improve practices for companies of all sizes, K-12 and higher education, government, healthcare, hospitality, retail and large venue spaces. He is especially interested in the future of work and education and the Internet of Things. Follow him @BlackwoodTweets.

Tagged With: AV Installer, EdTech, Higher Ed, Integration

Related Content:

  • Mindbody wellness tech WalkMe Mindbody Enlists WalkMe to Drive Digital Transformation
  • Zero Trust, ZTNA, Syxsense Syxsense Unveils New Module for Zero Trust Compliance
  • Insider Risk, cyber risk, insurance, cybersecurity GlobalData GlobalData: Cybersecurity Revenue in Insurance Set to Grow…
  • This Week in IT, IT News This Week in IT: Google Meet, Cisco Attack,…

Free downloadable guide you may like:

  • Shadow ITBlueprint Series: How to Reduce Shadow IT

    The distributed work model gives employees the flexibility they demand, but it can lead to shadow IT and introduce unnecessary security risk. Research finds that this distributed work environment is leading to IT management blind spots and shadow IT.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the FREE Tech Decisions eNewsletter

Sign up Today!

Latest Downloads

Shadow IT
Blueprint Series: How to Reduce Shadow IT

The distributed work model gives employees the flexibility they demand, but it can lead to shadow IT and introduce unnecessary security risk. Resea...

Hybrid Work webinar
Featured Webcast: Collaboration 2.0 — Where Are We Now?

In this webinar, subject matter experts discuss the transformation of the workplace, the rise of hybrid workers, the importance of open connectivit...

guide to end user training cover
Pro Tips for Conducting End User Training

Effective trainings are the glue that can make the difference following a new technology implementation that your team has spent so much time, effo...

View All Downloads

Would you like your latest project featured on TechDecisions as Project of the Week?

Apply Today!
Sharp Microsoft Collaboration HQ Logo

Learn More About the
Windows Collaboration Display

More from Our Sister Publications

Get the latest news about AV integrators and Security installers from our sister publications:

Commercial IntegratorSecurity Sales

AV-iQ

Footer

TechDecisions

  • Home
  • Welcome to TechDecisions
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Media Solutions & Advertising
  • Comment Guidelines
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin

Free Technology Guides

FREE Downloadable resources from TechDecisions provide timely insight into the issues that IT, A/V, and Security end-users, managers, and decision makers are facing in commercial, corporate, education, institutional, and other vertical markets

View all Guides
TD Project of the Week

Get your latest project featured on TechDecisions Project of the Week. Submit your work once and it will be eligible for all upcoming weeks.

Enter Today!
Emerald Logo
ABOUTCAREERSAUTHORIZED SERVICE PROVIDERSTERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

© 2022 Emerald X, LLC. All rights reserved.